Stories About The Occasional Non-lament(able) Post

Broadway’s ‘Harmony’ includes origin story of San Francisco cantor

Updated Dec. 27

I was in New York recently to see a jolly round of nine shows. A surprise favorite was the musical “Harmony” about the Comedian Harmonists, an internationally famous German singing group that was forced to disband because of antisemitism amid the rise of fascism before World War II.

The musical, which opened on Broadway in November, was a stark and timely reminder, not only of the peril of antisemitism but also of the constant threat to democracy across the globe.

The all-male sextet was made up of three Jews and three non-Jews. They were Harry Frommermann, Erich A. Collin, Roman Cycowski, Asparuh “Ari” Leschnikoff, Robert Biberti and Erwin Bootz.

Cycowski’s name may sound familiar. He was a longtime cantor at Temple Beth Israel in San Francisco, which is now part of Congregation Am Tikvah. Cycowski then served as cantor at Temple Isaiah in Palm Springs for several decades before his death in 1998.

The Comedian Harmonists performed from 1928 to 1934. Their repertoire ranged from folk to classical to popular songs, often performed amid comedic bits.

In their show, during a triumphant appearance at Carnegie Hall in December 1933, the members debated whether to return to Germany amid rising overt antisemitism in their homeland.

The musical is brought to a halt when Albert Einstein, visiting them backstage, issues this warning: “Throughout the course of history, the failure of democracies has set the stage for the success of tyrants. Greed and hatred is a proven formula for success. In the short term, at least. An unfortunate legacy for our species.”

The audience, clearly recognizing the power and timeliness of these words, went wild with applause. The action on stage paused for a moment.

The driving force behind the musical has been songwriter Barry Manilow who developed it with his longtime lyricist, Bruce Sussman. Getting the production to Broadway was a multi-decade work of love for 80-year-old Manilow.

His inspiration for the show came after seeing a 1977 German documentary about the group.

The musical offered little in the way of joyful sing-along moments of “Copacabana” or “Mandy.” How could it? It is about prejudice, Kristallnacht, the Depression, Hitler’s rise and World War II.

The songs were strong. The story was powerful. The cast was talented. The show was good entertainment. But most of all, it was a powerful reminder of what antisemitism and indifference to injustice can do.

For the original Comedian Harmonists, the lessons of their time were clear. First, the Nazis harassed them and banned pieces they performed by Jewish composers. Then, the Nazis forbade them from touring abroad and finally prohibited the group from performing in public at home.

The three Jewish members of the ensemble fled the country. For a time, the three non-Jews were imprisoned and then were sent to the frontlines to fight. The Nazis imprisoned the wife of Bootz, one of the non-Jewish singers. She was a Jew and a Bolshevik.

All six men survived the war.

Various incarnations of the Comedian Harmonists followed, but none was as successful as the original group, and the six men never reunited after parting.

Two of the members came to the U.S. and settled in California: Cycowski and Collin. The latter worked for Northrop, the aircraft manufacturer, and ran a small plastics workshop on the side.

Cycowski, the last surviving member of the sextet, continued to sing until his death.

“Harmony” not only honors the memory of the Comedian Harmonists but also serves as a powerful reminder of injustice in our own unharmonious times.

Correction: An earlier version of this column said Erwin Bootz’s wife, Ursula, died in the Holocaust. In fact, she survived and moved to California.

FIRST PERSON: With modern medicine, I could love to 100. But do I want to?

Does the thought of a super long life thrill you or chill you?

Once upon a time, the idea of living to be 100 was extraordinary. Now, while hardly commonplace, it’s certainly more common and the ranks of hardy centenarians will only continue to grow as healthcare advances continue.

There were nearly 600,000 centenarians worldwide in 2022, according to a United Nations estimate. By 2050, that number is expected to jump to 3.7 million.

I’m of two minds about living to such a ripe old age.

On a good day, it thrills me. The prospect of more adventures, more time with family, more time to read. These are appealing notions.

On a day when my knees and back ache, I dunno. And I’m still in my 60s.

The question of longevity came into sharp focus recently when my husband and I sat down with our financial adviser for a long-postponed estate-planning session.

It began with the question of how long we expect to live. My husband said 90 years. I said 100, as I thought of the recently departed diplomat Henry Kissinger and actress Glynis Johns who both made it to the century mark.

We split the difference and landed on 95. It sounded wild. It sounded ridiculous. Yet, who knows?

I started to say, “Well, of course, that’s the best-case scenario.” But the financial planner interrupted before I could finish the thought.

One day, we could all outlive Methuselah, who, according to Genesis, lived to a ripe old age of 969.

“Actually, from a monetary standpoint, a shorter lifespan is the better-case scenario. It gives you more money to spend and leaves more money for your heirs.”

Well, huh! So much for Mr. Spock’s “Live long and prosper.” Apparently from an economic perspective, we all should live short to prosper.

Even as I ponder our fiscal finale, I’ve found a new wrinkle — pardon the pun — to consider regarding longevity. I recently read about the possibility of a medication now under development that might extend the lifespan of dogs.

It immediately made me think about the possibilities for humans. Who knows? One day we could all outlive Methuselah, who, according to Genesis, lived to a ripe old age of 969.

But in a world with serious troubles — homelessness, poverty, political divisions — is searching for a fountain of youth the best way to invest our resources? Is longevity the only benchmark we want our children to measure us by?

Do we want them to eulogize us by simply noting, “Yep, our parents sure lived to ripe old ages”? Or do we want them proudly to proclaim, “Our parents devoted themselves to building a shenere un besere velt, a more beautiful and better world”?

For me, the answer is clear. I bet it is for you, too.

Despite my worries about how long I might last, I know I will live the days I do have left in the same way I have always lived them: joyfully and doing the best I can for myself, my family and for others — just as my parents and my traditions have taught me.

Yes, in the end, it isn’t a question of how many years you live but how well you spend them and how much good you can do along the way.

Still, I do wonder about that doggie life-extension medication. If it’s good enough for a canine, could it be good enough for me? How else will I ever whittle down that massive pile of books on my nightstand?

FIRST PERSON: Tulips, inner turmoil and missing Jews on my trip to Europe

Many trips to Europe are filled with exhilarating tours of castles and cathedrals, museums and moats, art and architecture. I love these trips, but during my most recent travels in March, I got stuck on two troubling topics.

The first: Where are the proudly proclaimed markers of Jewish life in the great European cities? Why are they — we — erased or at least largely invisible from the tours and guidebooks?

Second, for all the glory and achievement, why hasn’t humankind learned to respect or, at minimum, tolerate religious, ethnic and cultural differences?

These questions quickly bubbled up as my husband and I began a five-country trip.

In Split, Croatia, within a 3rd century Roman fortress stands a tiny synagogue, one of the oldest Sephardic houses of worship still in use. Built in the early 1500s, the Split Synagogue somehow has managed to survive, much like the vines and shrubs that cling to the walls of the ancient fortress.

Accessed via security camera and buzzer, the combined shul/community center is the focal point of worship and solidarity for Split’s 100-plus Jews. It also is a symbol of endurance. On the wall to the left of the bimah is a plaque with the names of 150 Jews killed in the Holocaust. Around the corner is another plaque recalling Split’s own Kristallnacht when Jewish businesses were ransacked and shopkeepers beaten.

In Split, we toured the former mausoleum of Roman emperor Diocletian. In life, Diocletian persecuted Christians. After his death, Christians took revenge, emptying his tomb and that of his wife and converting the mausoleum into a cathedral. The attackers missed the combined tiny tomb of his two daughters. It still sits high atop the cathedral’s entrance, a lonely reminder of parental love and hatred between rival groups.

All that remains of the Mostar synagogue destroyed in WWII. (Photo/Karen Galatz)
All that remains of the Mostar synagogue destroyed in World War II. (Photo/Karen Galatz)

We next traveled to Mostar, Bosnia-Herzegovina, where 2,000 people died in religious-secular wars as Yugoslavia unraveled with communism’s collapse in the 1990s. Today that city is rebuilding. Yet the scars of war — bombed-out buildings and shrapnel-pocked roads — are everywhere. Also, everywhere are the calls to prayer at mosques and the pealing bells at churches.

As for the Jews? We saw only an empty lot with a Star of David and a menorah on a fence — remnants of a synagogue destroyed during World War II.

In contrast stands Prague’s robust Jewish Quarter in the Czech Republic. Prague’s Jewish community is one of Europe’s oldest recorded, dating back to at least 965 CE. Before WWII, the city’s Jewish population was estimated at 92,000. At least two-thirds of them perished in the Holocaust.

Today while just 2,000 Jews live in Prague, there are synagogues of all denominations, a home for seniors, a kindergarten, kosher restaurants and a hotel with a kosher kitchen. Among the more memorable and humbling sights are the Old Cemetery, which dates to the 15th century and the Pinkas Synagogue, which lists the names of 77,297 Czech Jews who perished in the Holocaust.

Outside of Prague is the city of Terezin and the concentration camp with gates that 150,000 Jews walked through. The guide at Terezin kept calling it a “transit site.” This insistence was unsettling, disturbing, a soft-pedaling of the atrocities that occurred there.

In the Netherlands, we spent a joyous few days seeing tulips galore, 290 Van Gogh paintings, Rembrandt’s home/studio and seven Vermeer masterpieces. Then, we plunged back into our explorations of Jewish history, touring Anne Frank’s hiding place, the just-opened National Holocaust Museum and the Hollandsche Schouwburg, a theater the Nazis used as a deportation center.

(Photo/Karen Galatz)
We saw tulips galore in the Netherlands. (Photo/Karen Galatz)

More happily, we visited the 17th century Portuguese Synagogue, still an active house of worship and site of one of the world’s oldest Jewish libraries.

After three weeks, we flew home. We had seen the best and the worst of civilization. Tulips and turmoil. Art and anguish.

Unpacking, I continued thinking about my initial questions. Generally, I understand why Jews, along with other non-Christian religions, are not the focus of the “story” of Europe. We are not the majority, not the main interest of most tourists.

It makes me grateful that there is now a thriving industry of Jewish-themed heritage tours. Still, I wish there was greater religious, ethnic and cultural inclusivity in all tours.

Of course, the problem of “uncomfortable” truths also challenges the telling of Jewish and other peoples’ stories. Antisemitism, racism, colonization, the Holocaust … the list is long.

As for my second query about mankind’s failure to constructively engage with one another and peacefully manage conflict, what can I or anyone say?

Still, it occurs to me that my seemingly unrelated questions are connected. If we all learned more about our unique — and simultaneously shared — histories, maybe we would be more tolerant of our differences. And perhaps, someday, that tolerance could foster greater respect and reduce hatred and violence.

FIRST PERSON | In Jewish tradition, I’m not just old — I’m wise

A birthday cake with lit candles

I just celebrated my 70th birthday. The transition to a new decade is undoubtedly a milestone. You might wonder, do I have angst about aging? Well, a little. But mostly I’m looking forward to the years ahead.

I got hearing aids in March. I’m currently recuperating from bunion surgery. And I have opted out of cataract surgery so far, not because I don’t need it, but because I’m still looking for an eye doctor who’s a bit more haimish and less a factory manager with a preprinted, pricey menu of options.

Yes, the signs are clear. Well, blurrrrry. I am advancing in years.

Still, I am comforted that our religion hails 70 years as a significant number that represents completeness and wisdom. According to the sages, one who reaches 70 has lived a “fullness of years.” (Pirkei Avot 5:21)

In Judaism, 70 represents the number of nations in the ancient world, the number of Jacob’s descendants who went down to Egypt and the number of elders designated to assist Moses.

If Jewish tradition is good with 70, then so am I.

There was a time, not long ago, that I could not have said this. I wasn’t happy. I spent a lot of time — too much time — yearning for the past and missing loved ones who had died. It was as if every day there was a yahrzeit candle burning a hole in my heart and soul. 

I’m not 100 percent sure how I climbed out of this mournful state, but thankfully I did. Two activities have clearly played a big role.

The first was starting rigorous exercise. I’ve become a regular gym rat, working with a bulked-up, tattooed-to-the-max, fear-inspiring trainer named Jesse. I now pump iron like Arnold Schwarzenegger! Well, more like Arnold if he had a bad back, osteopenia and lifted laughably tiny weights.

Second, I started working as a writing coach at the local university’s journalism school. I sincerely believe that the enthusiasm, passion and curiosity of the students have been infectious and recharged my optimism battery like only young people can.

So, happily, I’ve rebounded and have a renewed zest for living. In fact, I think I’m zestier than ever.

I recently returned from a New York City marathon — of 10 shows. Even for theater-a-holic me, that’s a new record. And it wasn’t just a nonstop show-a-thon. Laura, my friend of 51 years, and I walked our (bad) feet off — like in the old days at Barnard College, traipsing up Madison Avenue and along the East River on a picture-perfect sunny day.

Meanwhile, my husband and I have been on a different type of marathon, logging more travel miles in one season than ever before. We spent three weeks in Europe this spring and also blitzed off to freezing Alaska and Canada to see the Aurora Borealis.

At home, I’m devouring books at record speed. You’d think they were chocolates. My appetite for reading has become insatiable. There’s just so much to learn. Again, the sages say 70 represents an age of wisdom. I’m definitely not “wise,” but I’m still working hard on acquiring knowledge and insight.

When the day comes and my time is up, I hope the cause of death will be “smothered under an avalanche of books from an adjacent nightstand.”

Among the books I’ve recently read is “The Virtues of Aging” by former President Jimmy Carter. Published in 1998, it is a sweet book, filled with the gentle folksy wisdom. Speaking for himself and former first lady Rosalynn Carter, he wrote:

“There is no doubt that we now cherish each day more than when we were younger. Our primary purpose in our golden years is not just to stay alive as long as we can, but to savor every opportunity for pleasure, excitement, adventure, and fulfillment.”

These words seem especially poignant with the first lady’s passing in November and his precarious health at age 99.

Yet the thought behind those words resonates with me, especially the point about fulfillment. My husband and I have no plans to retire. Work is a defining part of our identities. I guess we’re emulating my parents and oldest brother who all worked and continued to engage with the community till the day they each died.

There’s a saying about dying with your “boots on.” That’s the plan, although in my case it’s more likely to be a pair of sneakers or orthopedic sandals.

FIRST PERSON | What I learned hosting a Jordanian exchange student in my home

headshot of Karen Galatz

Here in the United States, politics are fraying the bonds between families and among friends. How then can strangers of profoundly different backgrounds stand a chance of getting along?

This wasn’t an abstract question for me. It was a concrete concern as I readied our house for a homestay visit of a college exchange student from Jordan.

From the brief biography we received, I knew Abdel observed halal dietary restrictions and did not drink alcohol. In the days before his arrival, my husband and I excitedly planned menus and outings. I imagined topics to discuss — family, customs and life in Jordan.

Then, it occurred to me: We’d eventually talk about the fighting in the Middle East. How would we navigate that topic, coming at it from such wildly different backgrounds?

Then, a second thought: I knew our guest was Muslim, but did he know I was Jewish?

My concern was mostly for him, a 20-year-old, religiously observant, first-time visitor to the U.S. How would he feel staying with Jews? We were fine. We were adults, who had willingly opened our home, but how about him?

Would he, who had merely been assigned a random housing slot, feel blindsided, uncomfortable, overwhelmed or, God forbid, hostile? If he was hostile, would we really be “fine”? Would we all be able to manage his time at our house, or would his stay with us end before the allotted time? What if he refused to stay?

At first excited, I now felt nervous and unsure.

I contacted the exchange program director, who reaffirmed that the whole point of a cultural exchange program was dialogue and education. More specifically, he affirmed that Abdel was “cool” and could handle the religious issue.

So, it was all systems go.

The night before Abdel’s arrival, I stepped into the guest room to do a final balaboosta dusting and pillow fluffing when I saw it — or more precisely — didn’t see it.

Where once behind the bed hung three rows of my beloved record album covers, framed in a perfect grid, now hung only two rows. An entire row was missing and the five holes in the wall patched.

“What the …?” I gasped, bewildered.

Without discussion and for reasons unclear, my husband had “destroyed” my prized record collection display. This was decorating blasphemy!

I stomped/clomped down the hall, heart pounding in a roaring rage, to demand an explanation.

Glancing up from the TV, Jon laughed gently and said, “Oh, sorry. I forgot to tell you. One of your albums struck me as a bridge too far for our guest. You know the Jewish comedy record with the scantily clad woman on the cover? It just seemed so culturally insensitive. So I took it down, but that messed up the design. So, finally, I took down the whole row. I promise I’ll put them up right away when Abdel leaves.”

The “offending” album was “Jewish Comedy Songs” by the Barton Brothers, a postwar Yinglish comedy duo. The record had belonged to my parents. Putting aside the title, the image of the nearly naked babe had, in fact, mortified me as a child. So I can just imagine what our five-times-a-day praying guest would have thought!

I apologized to my husband and praised him for spotting the questionable “art.”

As for the visit with our young Jordanian guest? We had a lot of fun showing him around our community, discovering similarities between our cultures and cuisines, talking about family life, work, culture and religion. I even had a giggly conversation with Abdel’s mother in Amman via FaceTime — although she darted offscreen when my husband walked over to say hello since she wasn’t wearing her hijab.

On Adel’s last morning with us, we finally talked about the Middle East. “Are you sure we should?” Abdel asked, raising a worried eyebrow.

Our views were, not unexpectedly, wildly divergent. Abdel told me Hamas was not “as bad” as we in the West are being told, and that he believes Israelis do not want a two-state solution.

We listened to each other’s views respectfully, holding our tempers and tongues when necessary. Obviously, this 70-year-old Jew and the 20-year-old son of a Palestinian refugee father were not going to alter each other’s opinions over one breakfast of scrambled eggs, turkey bacon and toast.

But at least we proved calm debate could occur. We also proved that two families — even via FaceTime and translation — could find common ground over shared recipes, love of children and belief in the value of education and hard work.

Our young friend has since returned home. We have exchanged emails. Abdel wants to return here for work next summer. And my record album wall grid has been restored … at least until then.

There is no grand moral to this story. All that can be said is that a friendship was formed. Domestic life goes on for two families — one Muslim in Jordan and one Jewish in America. Meanwhile, war wages on in the Middle East.

FIRST PERSON | Reality gobbled up our plan to host Algerian tourists for a holiday

How does the old saying go? The best-laid plans of mice, men and hostesses often go awry.

My husband and I were scheduled to host eight Algerian exchange visitors for a Thanksgiving meal last month. The group would be in town for a few days as part of a U.S. State Department tourism education program. 

I’m on the board of an international exchange organization, so this was my  “in” to host the group.

The dinner offered Jon and me the chance of a longed-for return to Thanksgiving celebrations of old when extended family gathered in gluttonous glory. 

Such gatherings had become a thing of the past more than a decade ago. Deaths, distance, divorce and general discord contributed to the demise of the once-joyous annual gathering of the clan.  

Even in our nuclear family, there’s been a seismic rupture to our holiday. Our adult children dislike the historical and political symbolism of Thanksgiving, plus one is a zealous vegetarian. 

So over time we, the exhausted but nurturing parents, had come to focus on the meaning of family and gratitude and to plan a menu around starches. Secretly, though, we yearn for turkey.

But now, this November, for the sake of “international harmony,” we jumped at the excuse — I mean, opportunity — to serve a traditional meal. Faster than you can say “jellied cranberry sauce,” Jon and I said, “Yes, yes, yes!”

We planned our turkey-centric menu, drooling like fowl-famished wolves. I polished the silver till my arthritic fingers ached. I pulled Grandma’s hand-embroidered tablecloth and napkins out of the linen closet. We dusted off the card table and chairs long ago relegated to the garage. 

All systems go!

Then, it started getting complicated. 

T-Day Minus 7: I got the bios of our guests. Only three spoke English! OK, we’d manage.

T-Day Minus 5: I received an email asking if our turkey was halal. Huh? I thought halal meant no pork and no alcohol. Wrong! Halal meat, like kosher meat, is about a specific form of ritual slaughter. So my hunt for a halal turkey — in Reno, Nevada — began. 

The effort to purchase a 17-pound halal turkey was arduous. 

“So big! At this late date! Very difficult! Do you really need such a big bird? OK, I will try. Come tomorrow,” sighed the shopkeeper in a lovely Indian accent but deeply weary voice.

I showed up at 11 a.m. The sign said the shop opened at 10. The door was locked and the interior dark. I waited for a quarter-hour. A middle-aged woman, dressed in a sari, arrived, unlocked the door and turned the “closed” sign to “open.” 

I waited a respectful 30 seconds and rushed in. 

“Oh, you’re too early, she said with a wave of her arm, her bangles jingling. “My husband doesn’t have your big turkey yet.”

The next day — at a suitably later hour — I returned. The shopkeeper said, “I had to go to five places to get this big halal bird for you.”

I told him I would give special thanks for his efforts at our holiday meal. This satisfied him.

T-Day Minus 3: Three Algerians were out. Travel plan hitches. 

T-Day Minus 1: Four of our American guests cancelled. Felled by the flu. 

Meanwhile, Jon was busy in the kitchen. Thanksgiving is his one big cooking day of the year. He’d been prepping like an athlete training for the big game. He’d evaluated defrosting techniques, brining options and stuffing ideas. He was a man with a cooking plan. 

Aside from actually putting food into the oven, he had most of his work done the night before.

My cooking duties were set to begin T-Day morning. I was on tap to make brownies, carrot souffle, green beans with almonds, a salad and an appetizer plate.

Then, disaster hit. 

I woke up shivering, actually quaking. I was coughing and sneezing. I ached everywhere and could barely stand. 

We debated quarantining me in the bedroom and having Jon assume solo hosting duties. But what if I was contagious? What if Jon was germy? Would he spread my “whatever” bug to our visitors?

So… we canceled our dinner. The sponsors of our Algerian guests saw that they were accommodated with dinner at a restaurant. They were gracious, of course. Our other guests, likewise, had to fend for themselves.

I didn’t have any bird that night, but Jon said it was great.

The Algerians departed town before I was well enough to meet them. 

There is no great lesson to end this story. I can, however, offer a truly bad pun: The road to halal is paved with good intentions.

FIRST PERSON | I found hope in the founding of the War Refugee Board

The holidays are long over. I’ve scraped the menorah of its drippy wax. I’ve washed and ironed the hand-embroidered tablecloth. Only the extra weight and the credit card bills remain as evidence of the festivities. 

I was yearning for inspiration to keep me moving forward in the new year — amid the unsettling political landscape, the troubled state of the world and especially as we marked International Holocaust Remembrance Day on Jan. 27, the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz.

I needed a hero and, happily, I found one. His name: John Pehle.

A son of German immigrants, Pehle was born in Minnesota in 1909. Shortly after graduating from Yale Law School, he started working at the U.S. Treasury Department.  

At Treasury, he co-authored “The Acquiescence of This Government in the Murder of the Jews,” a 1944 report on the U.S. government’s failure to rescue Europe’s Jewry. Perhaps even worse, the report detailed the government’s efforts to prevent and obstruct such rescue attempts and to block information about Jews from reaching the American public. 

The report title alone was so damning that it was softened to “A Personal Report to the President.”

On Jan. 13, 1944, Pehle and Treasury Secretary Robert Morgenthau presented that report to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. They also handed him a draft executive order to create a new government agency tasked with the “immediate rescue and relief of the Jews of Europe and other victims of enemy persecution.”

One week later that order was signed and created the War Refugee Board. Pehle was its first director. He was 34 years old. 

He was interviewed shortly after his appointment. 

“I am aware that we face perhaps the greatest humanitarian task of all time. I am aware of the urgency of that task. We must thwart the Nazi program swiftly and decisively,”  Pehle said. “We have no blueprints to guide us. We have no precedents to show us the way. There are no panaceas, no pat formulas to meet these problems.” 

To do the job, Pehle and his self-described staff of “red-tape cutters” negotiated interagency conflicts, streamlined humanitarian aid to Europe, released detailed reports of the horrors in the Auschwitz and Birkenau death camps, financed evacuation efforts, established refugee camps, issued visas, created false ID papers and reportedly even laundered money and paid bribes to Nazi sympathizers via covert agents. In short, he and his staff did everything they could to save lives.

And save lives they did. By the War Refugee Board’s own estimates, the organization saved tens of thousands of European Jews who otherwise would have died at the hands of the Nazis in the last two years of the Second World War. According to some historians, the number of lives saved exceeded 200,000.

Yet, Pehle — a man whose whistleblowing and leadership played a central role in every life saved — was modest in the extreme. 

“What we did was little enough. It was late. Late and little, I would say. Looking back at the board, the resources available were too small to deal effectively with the problem,” he later said. “But we were able to change the policy of the United States, and we were able to help the private agencies, and we were able to change the moral position of the United States in this area.”

After the war, Pehle entered private practice as a tax attorney. He died of cancer in 1999.

In 2006, Pehle was posthumously awarded a Congressional Gold Medal “in recognition of his contributions to the nation in helping rescue Jews and other minorities from the Holocaust during World War II.”

You can read more about Pehle in Rebecca Erbelding’s “Rescue Board: The Untold Story of America’s Efforts to Save the Jews of Europe.” Her book, published in 2018, won several accolades, including a National Jewish Book Award. Her research also played a major role in Ken Burns’ 2022 docuseries “The U.S. and the Holocaust.”

I’ve been thinking a lot about Pehle these days as the new administration restricts immigration and begins mass deportations. I wonder where someone of Pehle’s courage and conviction might fit in. 

His example gives me the courage to face the challenges ahead, large and small. As always, Jews must strive to create “a shenere un besere velt,” Yiddish for “a more beautiful and better world.”

OPINION | After friend’s assisted death, I wonder: Is there a ‘right’ way to die?

Indisputably, people are living longer lives, but longevity without health is not necessarily a blessing. 

I just lost two close friends. Now, in addition to mourning the passing of their steady and cheery companionship, I am confronted with unexpected questions about the decidedly different ways their lives ended.

One died a “natural” death after a long, debilitating neuromuscular disease, marked by ever-increasing physical and mental incapacity, a loss of independence and dignity, and a rise in emotional distress — all shocking to witness in a man once imbued with grace, wit and power.

The other — a funny, sweet, man, once bouncy and larger-than-life — suffered in horrific pain from cancer, unable to eat or drink. He had successfully recovered from one exhausting series of chemotherapy treatments, only to have the disease return, super-charged and unstoppable. 

With no hope of cure or relief, this friend decided to exercise control of at least one last measure of his life: its end. Surrounded by his children, he opted for a medically assisted death. I am writing this the day after his death, as I mourn.

Medically assisted death is controversial among many segments of society, including religious communities. In Judaism, the debate begins with the belief that every person, having been created in the image of God, is sacred and that there is value in every moment of every life. 

For Orthodox Jews, that view renders the idea of assisted death as unacceptable. But over recent decades, the perspective of Conservative and Reform Jews has slowly evolved. According to a recent J. story on assisted death, Conservative Rabbi Elliot N. Dorff published a responsum in late 2020 arguing that “in a limited number of cases … we should allow aid in dying.”

Philosophically — from the vantage point of youth — I always thought it was a person’s right to choose dignity over pain and suffering when the end was inevitable and near. But now that I’m older, these decisions are starting to hit closer to home, and it all feels much more complicated.

Thinking about my friend who literally just opted out, I feel sad and also a bit conflicted. 

First of all, let me be clear, I don’t judge him. I’m profoundly grateful that he is no longer in pain. I’m also grateful that his children won’t have to continue to witness his torment. I’ve been there with my mother, and I remember that particular sadness and feeling of utter helplessness all too well.

Yet, this notion of willfully ending our one dance on Planet Earth is such an immense — and — when you think about it — brave step. With no pun intended, I can say that it takes my breath away. 

Again, I don’t judge. I haven’t faced the abyss of agonizing, relentless pain that my friend was staring down. I haven’t known the terror of terminal cancer’s ticking clock. All I know is that I am grateful that people in a handful of states have a right to make a choice and that, in my friend’s case, he had a supportive family with him.

Life is hard. Dying is too. From what I’ve seen so far, too few of us go easily, and in the end, isn’t that what we all wish for?

I recently met two models of resilience who supercharged me

Rosie the Riveter poster

I like to start my day with a kvetch and a stretch. I get my aching mind going and then my aching body in gear. Yet as any “almost oldster” knows, resilience is the key to getting through life. 

Recently — coincidentally on the same day — I met two models of resilience who supercharged me with inspiration and delight.

The first one I met was at dinner. My husband and I joined a long-ago work colleague who was in town with his wife. We had never before met the woman (whom I’ll call Linda for the sake of privacy). Linda is undergoing chemotherapy.

We spotted Linda first at the restaurant. She was wearing a funny, furry, floppy hat, making her hard to miss on a sunny day in a casual, all-you-can-eat sushi restaurant.

Even before we sat down and introductions were made, Linda rushed to say, “I have hair. Lots of hair, but I just got a massage, and my hair’s a mess. That’s why I’m wearing a hat.”

That hair comment was the only reference to Linda’s health made during the entire meal. The woman and her spouse were completely focused on the moment and the meal.

They were the most lively, joyous people I have spent an evening with in a long time. They spoke of their travels and the books they’re reading, and they peppered us with questions about our lives, work and interests. 

Linda took the lead in ordering. She ordered sushi like she was preparing for a party of 20. The waiter even asked if more people were joining us and if he should move us to a larger table!

Smiling, she said, “No, I just love sushi.”

And, wow, could that woman eat sushi. I never saw anyone eat like she did. Gusto is too mild a word for the way she chowed down. I, who shudder at the sight of fish, cooked or raw, giggled as she oohed and aahed nonstop.

When the meal — including three kinds of mochi for dessert — ended, Linda jumped up and said, “Gotta go.”

I worried that she was sick from eating so much, but no, she explained, she had just gotten a notice that a package she ordered had just been delivered.

“I never was good at crafts,” she said, “I can’t knit or sew, but I just read about punch sewing, which is a dumbed-down craft. I’m going to try it. I’m making coasters.”

And with that, our ebullient new friend and her husband sped off into the night.

May we all, in the face of life-threatening disease, live so fully, getting massages, wearing outrageous hats, eating heartily and trying new projects. That’s resilience.

Two hours later, I headed over to a sleep laboratory for a sleep study. That’s where I met my second resilience inspiration.

In this instance, it was a young person — the 27-year-old technician who works the night shift at the sleep lab. She has the laborious job of attaching the bazillion sticky wires to patients’ heads and bodies to track their brain waves and breathing. And then she monitors them throughout the night. 

Now, attaching those wires is no speedy task, and so Yolanda (not her real name) and I had a long time to talk. And talk we did. My young tech told me all about her life. She’s the mother of two, including one child who has a developmental disorder. She is in the middle of a second divorce, works full time and is going to nursing school. 

Was she exhausted? Bitter? Struggling? No. No. No. Just the opposite. She was all spunk and joy. She told me proudly that her 8-year-old son had just learned to say “mama” and how much he loves dinosaurs. She told me how much she loves her job and about her pride in going back to school. She spoke of her gratitude toward her parents for helping with her children so she could continue working toward her goals.

Now, as I age, I realize that resiliency is the skill we all need to cultivate even if our obstacles seemingly pale in comparison to those of others. We all have to be heroes of our own stories.

I am suddenly obsessing over ages in obituaries

Leonard Cohen performs

I don’t buy lottery tickets or even have a lucky number. Yet I’m obsessed with numbers.

What kind of numbers? The age that people die. 

It’s morbid, I know. 

People back in Biblical times had it easy. The early chapters of Genesis mention people living for nearly 1,000 years. They didn’t have to start worrying about death till they hit 900. By Genesis 6:3, our lifespan was trimmed to 120 years. But that’s still much higher than any of us can expect today.

So I find myself reading obituaries and carefully noting the age of the deceased. If they’re younger than me, I’m sad and wonder about the cause of death. I murmur about the inexplicable mystery of why some people die young. If the person is older, I count the years they outlived me and cheer their longevity. I read their obituary avidly for insights, hints and clues about how they made it to such a long life. Good for them! If they can do it, I reason, so can I.

But the deaths that completely seize my attention are the folks who pass at my exact age: 71. Yikes! That’s too close for comfort. Too personal. 

What happened? Was it cancer? A heart attack? 

These obits I read with laser focus, like a detective, seeking detailed forensic evidence about their demise.

This sudden numerical obsession is silly and ungracious. I hope it is a passing phase.

It is only rivaled by a second later-in-life obsession. I call it “Dead Musicians Mania.” Although not listed in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, I suspect that it afflicts many people around my age.

I describe it as both the prolonged mourning that occurs when beloved musicians of our youth die — and the grief felt each time we hear their music. This sensation is greater than nostalgia. It is acute, deep and painful to the ear and heart.

It’s bad enough that the musicians we love wrinkle and sag. But the fact that they inevitably shed their mortal coil and leave us mourning anew each time a favorite song plays — well that’s just cruel. It’s a nonstop playlist of our own mortality. Who needs that?

The most recent whammies for me were Sly Stone of Sly and the Family Stone and Brian Wilson of the Beach Boys, who passed away within days of each other in June. Both were 82. And to think, I’m still missing Leonard Cohen, who died nine years ago also at age 82, and Marvin Gaye, who died 41 years ago at age 44, much too young.

One day, I vow I will go through my music collection and weed out all the dead artists, but I’m guessing that would shrink my music collection by three-quarters.

I blame this musical mourning, at least partially, on my parents, may their memories be a blessing. It was their love of old-time Broadway show tunes that drags my music collection toward the Great Beyond, almost to the actual Great Depression.

Meanwhile, to prove that I am not a complete downer and that the eternal beat goes on, my musical tastes are evolving.

I can now truthfully brag that I listen to hip-hop and rap.

Thanks to the students I work with at the local university’s journalism school, I am decidedly au courant on the latest rappers — who are mercifully young and healthy. So I’ve found some “safe” musical ground! (They are also l-o-u-d, so my geriatric ears can actually hear the lyrics.)

As to the appropriateness of my recent oddball behaviors, I try not to judge myself too harshly. I recognize them for what they are — a way of coping with fear about aging and death.

I recognize I should handle these inevitabilities with greater grace. I know that I should thank HaShem for each day of good health and equally that I should turn to religion, instead of rap, for comfort and solace. Yet for the moment, I’m content(ish) in embracing rhythm, rebellion and actuarial charts.